Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Advocate Sandeep – CWP No. 640 of 2016 (O/M)

Advocate Sandeep – CWP No. 640 of 2016 (O/M)

223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 640 of 2016 (O/M)
Date of decision : 31.1.2017
Sundri Devi ……. Petitioner (s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others ……. Respondent (s)
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:- Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Keshav Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
-.- -.-
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)
The prayer of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for
computing her service as a daily wager towards qualifying service for
pension.
The learned State counsel has not disputed that as per Rule
3.17-A of the Punjab Civil Services Rules (as applicable to Haryana), the
service as a daily wager is to be computed as qualifying service for the grant
of pensionary benefits.
It being so, the daily wage service of the petitioner is liable to
be computed as qualifying service towards grant of pension and other retiral
benefits. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. Since the
petitioner retired from service on 31.10.2010 and she filed the present writ
petition in the year 2016, therefore, the arrears will be restricted to 38
months before the filing of the present writ petition.
(KULDIP SINGH)
JUDGE
31.1.2017
sjks
Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable : No
1 of 1
::: Downloaded on – 30-01-2018 12:21:10 :::

whatsapp icon
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt