Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

ADVOCATE PRASHANT – TA No.273 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Transfer Application No.273 of 2016
Date of decision: August 27, 2016
Vanita …Petitioner
Versus
Mukesh Kumar …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
Rajan Gupta, J.(oral)
Petitioner, who is wife of respondent, seeks transfer of
proceedings under section 9 of the Act pending at Bathinda to Patiala.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the jurisdiction
of Bathinda court is not made out. He submits that applicant has two
children to look after and she is living alone in Patiala. It would be difficult
for her to defend the proceedings at Bathinda, keeping in view her
responsibilities.
Respondent remains unrepresented despite service. This
petition is, thus, allowed. It is directed that the proceedings under section 9
of the Act pending at Bathinda be transferred to competent court at Patiala.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
August 27, 2016
‘Rajpal’
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable: Yes / No
1 of 1
::: Downloaded on – 30-01-2018 12:53:30 :::

whatsapp icon
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt